By: Matthew Choi

The Texas Legislature’s budget for the next two years includes $20 million more in funding for a controversial program that seeks to discourage women from getting abortions in the state.

Alternatives to Abortion uses contracted providers to offer services such as financial counseling and support groups for new parents, as well as children’s items such as car seats and infant formula. The extra money puts the program’s total operating budget at over $38 million, the highest it’s been since it began in 2006.

Enjoying our journalism? Consider liking us on Facebook and following us on Twitter. And if you want regular updates on all things Texas, sign up for The Brief here. And you can read more of our abortion coverage here.

The Texas Health and Human Services Commission, which oversees Alternatives to Abortion, said in a report it plans to use the funding to extend services for new parents until the child’s third birthday and connect pregnant mothers to financial assistance programs such as Medicaid, CHIP and food stamps. The commission also plans to expand job training and placement for mothers under the program, which will “lead to greater self-sufficiency and lower reliance on health and human service programs across the lifespan,” according to the report.

State law requires the Health and Human Services Commission to report funding needs to the governor and Legislature. Funding is allocated in two-year periods and has steadily grown each legislative session. The 2018-2019 period’s $20 million increase is the largest in the program’s history — four times its starting budget in 2006. The last increase was an additional $8 million beginning in 2016.

Anti-abortion groups have long lobbied to get greater funding for the program. Joe Pojman, executive director Texas Alliance for Life, said he was “ecstatic” to hear about the funding increases, saying it demonstrates the state’s priority in limiting abortion.

Pojman said expanding Alternatives to Abortion will save the state money by making helping new mothers become more financially independent and equipped to care for their children, lowering the number of parents relying on state social services.

“If they’re self sufficient through the process of childbirth and afterward, that saves the state money and makes for much happier women and children and families,” Pojman said.

By: MICAIAH BILGER

Texas religious leaders gathered Thursday to bless an abortion clinic and its staff as a judge considers whether to allow the state to ban brutal dismemberment abortions on live unborn babies.

The pro-abortion clergy prayed at the Whole Woman’s Health abortion facility in Fort Worth, Texas, blessing its staff and patients, saying prayers and singing “Hallelujah,” according to the Daily Caller.

The Texas abortion chain is one of the groups challenging the state dismemberment abortion ban. It also has a poor reputation for patient health and safety, racking up dozens of health and safety violations in the past decade. They include things like failures to properly sterilize equipment, rusty spots on medical equipment that had the “likelihood of causing infection,” rips in exam tables and more.

Kentina Washington-Leapheart, the director of reproductive justice and sexuality education at the Religious Institute, said they chose to bless this particular abortion clinic because it sees a lot of minority women and women in poverty.

“Women seeking an abortion are largely women of faith. They’re not having an abortion in spite of their faith, it’s in many ways informing the decision they make,” Washington-Leapheart told the Texas Observer. “They have a God-given right to make decisions about their life.”

“There are progressive people of faith, even in Texas,” Washington-Leapheart continued. “We’re trying to say [the extreme right’s] narrative isn’t the only narrative related to faith.”

“When thinking about access, we have to think about how race and class impact access,” she said.

Whole Woman’s Health runs four abortion facilities in Texas and several others in Maryland, Minnesota and Illinois. It also recently applied to open a new abortion facility in Indiana. State inspection reports obtained by Texas Alliance for Life in 2013 and new inspection reports released this fall showed dozens of violations that threatened the health and safety of its patients, including lack of sterilization of abortion instruments, lack of an RN or LVN on staff, rusty suction machines and expired and unlabeled medications.

By: Caroline Kelly

WASHINGTON — A House subcommittee debated a bill Wednesday that would ban nearly all abortions nationwide, a measure backed by 22 Texas Republicans.
The Heartbeat Protection Act would make it a crime for a doctor to perform an abortion if the fetus has a heartbeat, which can occur as early as six weeks into a pregnancy — before many women realize they’re pregnant.

Joe Pojman, executive director of the Texas Alliance for Life, which opposes abortion, said his group supports a ban and views such efforts as constitutional, but hasn’t asked Texas lawmakers to support King’s bill because it’s unlikely to survive a court challenge.
“There are not enough justices on the U.S. Supreme Court who would vote to uphold a law like this,” he told The Dallas Morning News. “It would certainly not sustain a challenge in federal court, and taxpayers would be forced to pay attorneys’ fees to the abortion providers, which only makes us weaker and makes the abortion industry stronger.”
Pojman noted that his group discouraged support for a bill fully banning abortion pushed by state Rep. Tony Tinderholt of Arlington in the last session of the Legislature. The bill never made it out of committee.

By: Max Gorden

TEXAS – A judge won’t order federal officials to allow a pregnant 17-year-old undocumented immigrant being held in a Texas immigration facility to get an abortion. Anti-abortion groups also say they’re concerned that granting undocumented immigrants the right to abortions could spark a flood of women seeking care coming over the border.

“We don’t think Texas should be a tourist state or place women come seeking abortions,” said Texas Alliance for Life Executive Director Joe Pojman.

By: Todd Ackerman

In a victory for Texas’ medical community, a Harris County state district judge Friday rejected a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of a state law that allows doctors to withdraw life-sustaining treatment against the wishes of the patient or guardian.

Judge Bill Burke said it would be “a case of throwing the baby out with the bath water” to repeal the controversial 1999 law, enacted in response to doctors’ push to eliminate care they believe prolongs suffering in terminal patients. The law, which is unique to Texas, has drawn criticism from some families who say it gives doctors too much power.
“It would be a big mistake to throw out a statute in place for nearly 20 years that seems to be working pretty well,” Burke said in rejecting the request for summary judgment declaring the law unconstitutional. “If you think the law doesn’t provide sufficient protection for patients, go to the Legislature to remedy it.”

The ruling was applauded by the Texas Medical Association, which was part of a broad coalition of groups who together filed a motion in support of the law. The groups included Texas Alliance For Life, the Texas Catholic Conference of Bishops, the Coalition of Texans With Disabilities and the Texas Alliance for Patient Access.

By: Charlie Butts

A pro-life leader from Texas contends that a court decision earlier this week underlines the need for more pro-life federal judges.

Federal District Judge Lee Yeakel issued a temporary injunction against a law banning dismemberment abortion, which was set to go into effect Friday.

Texas Alliance for Life Executive Director Joe Pojman is disappointed with the ruling.

“A state like Texas should have the right to protect unborn children from this absolutely gruesome method of abortion, which involves killing the baby by tearing him or her limb from limb,” Pojman argued.